Corn
QUIETStress 3/10
- ZCZ26.CBT Dec-2026 contango (stable) — deferred premium, near-term supply ample
- Des Moines: week-ahead forecast shows severe deficit rainfall
- Champaign: severe deficit rainfall — 36% of the 30-day normal
The verdict
For this scenario, about 24.2% of the world's corn exports would be exposed to the disruption, and the disruption runs 120 days against 60 days of assumed stockpile cover, leaving about 60 days beyond what the assumed stockpile covers.
In the recorded US drought, 2012 analog, corn futures rise +22.3% in 184 days (Feb 2012 → Aug 2012), and for consumers: grade A large eggs (US) rose +15.7% to +20.2% over 3–5 months. Illustrative — what happened then, not what will happen now.
Exposed ≠ lost. Illustrative scenario. Not a prediction. Not financial advice.
Share of the focus exporter's shipments disrupted
Days the disruption lasts
Assumed days of stockpile cover — an assumption, not a measured buffer
Evidence: Curated by Morrowfly — these are things to check, not monitor conditions.
Not a bet, not financial advice. Write your one-line read — we check back on February 12, 2027 and grade it in public.
The US is the top corn exporter. Explore what another 2012 would expose.
The United States is 30.3% of world corn exports by value (2024 vintage) — the largest corn exporter. In 2012 a hot, dry summer cut deep into the corn belt. This guide walks through what the monitor is seeing right now, how exposed the market is, and lets you model a drought yourself.
Historical check: The closest episode, US drought, 2012, saw corn futures move +22.3% (large band); your 80% disruption setting sits in the extreme band.
What share of United States’s corn exports is disrupted.
Resolution: Share of the focus exporter's shipments disrupted
Historical check: The closest episode, US drought, 2012, lasted 122 days (medium); your 120-day duration sits in the medium band.
Resolution: Days the disruption lasts
Your assumption — not a measured buffer.
Resolution: Assumed days of stockpile cover — an assumption, not a measured buffer
United States corn — 30.3% of world Corn exports (Share of global export value (USD) — 2024 vintage)
Exposed under your assumptions: 24.2% (30.3% × 80% severity)
The hatched area is modeled from your assumptions, not a measured outcome.
Exposed ≠ lost — affected trade can reroute, draw stocks, or substitute. This sizes the exposure, not the damage.
60 days buyers can't ride out — not automatically a physical shortage
What this would have meant
For this scenario, about 24.2% of the world's corn exports would be exposed to the disruption, and the disruption runs 120 days against 60 days of assumed stockpile cover, leaving about 60 days beyond what the assumed stockpile covers.
In the recorded US drought, 2012 analog, corn futures rise +22.3% in 184 days (Feb 2012 → Aug 2012), and for consumers: grade A large eggs (US) rose +15.7% to +20.2% over 3–5 months. Illustrative — what happened then, not what will happen now.
Analog check
Your settings look closest to US drought, 2012 (same commodity, same shock type, similar duration, similar supply concentration). The episode's measured moves, caveats included: corn futures +22.3% in 184 days (Feb 2012 → Aug 2012); Grade A large eggs (US): +15.7% to +20.2% over 3–5 months. Egg prices also move with holiday baking demand each December, energy and transport costs, and layer-flock size — not feed corn alone..
Only about 11.8¢ of every US consumer food dollar — and 18.5¢ of every food-at-home dollar — reaches the farm (USDA, 2024) — that's a ceiling, not a prediction: margins can absorb a spike or amplify it.
Illustrative — what happened then, not what will happen now. Your scenario differs: your 80% disruption setting implies an extreme move, while the episode's futures move was +22.3% (large).
Read the full recordScore 4/5 — close analog (headline).
Want the full controls? Reopen corn on its commodity page.
Corn
QUIETStress 3/10
Monitor data as of Nov 9, 2026. Scores are observed readings, not forecasts.
Follow the shock downstream — from the corn market, through processors, to the shelf. These are the usual stages, not this scenario's outcome: exposure at each step, never a prediction.
Day 0: corn futures spike
timing not establishedLag basis: lag not established in sources reviewed
Livestock and poultry producers (feed costs)
timing not establishedLag basis: lag not established in sources reviewed
Tyson Foods
TSNCorn, soybean meal and other feed ingredients represented roughly 61% of the cost of growing a live chicken in fiscal 2023
Source: Tyson Foods FY2023 10-K
Pilgrim's Pride
PPCIts U.S. and Mexico segments use corn and soybean meal as the main ingredients for feed production; its Europe segment uses wheat, soybean meal and barley
Source: Pilgrim's Pride 10-Q (SEC)
Ethanol producers
timing not establishedLag basis: lag not established in sources reviewed
Green Plains
GPREVertically integrated ethanol producer that buys and sells bulk grain, primarily corn and soybeans, to make ethanol and co-products
Sweeteners and soft drinks
timing not establishedLag basis: lag not established in sources reviewed
Illustrative scenario. Not a prediction. Not financial advice. Company entries describe factual exposure to the commodity — not a view on any stock.
Who ships it, who can’t do without it
2024 vintage · annual data, 1–2y lagSourced trade structure — the scenario’s shock geography at country resolution. Exposure, not a forecast.
Corn · United States
Top exporters
United Statesdominant
30.3% of world exports
Brazil
18.7% of world exports
Argentina
16.4% of world exports
Ukraine
13.1% of world exports
France
2.3% of world exports
Note: maize; seed 100510 excluded (negligible) Build used HS 100590 (maize excl. seed; 100510 seed excluded).
Exposed importers
Shocked exporters: United States
99.8% of Mexico’s corn imports come from United States
83% of Japan’s corn imports come from United States
24.7% of South Korea’s corn imports come from United States
US Gulf export system to Asia
via Panama Canal · 17% of US corn exports transiting the Panama Canal
Source: farmdoc daily (University of Illinois), 'Ripple effects of shipping lane disruptions on U.S. agriculture', FY2022
Exporter and importer shares are 2024 vintage · annual data, 1–2y lag from UN Comtrade and OEC (BACI/CEPII); an importer counts as exposed when ≥20% of its corn imports come from a shocked exporter. The shock geography is the scenario’s own focus selection. Annual data with a 1–2 year reporting lag — the structure moves slowly, the prices don’t.
For perspective, not prediction
The 2012 US drought: corn futures across two harvests
Jun – Sep 2012
“CBOT corn (ZC=F) rose 22.3% from Feb to Aug 2012 month-end, then fell 38.3% by Aug 2013. Those comparisons span different harvests and contracts; they do not isolate drought damage or establish that the next harvest will reverse a weather shock.”
Price moves were observed around the event — not proof the event caused the entire move.
Read the full recordEl Niño: different episodes, crops, and price benchmarks
Recurring — 2009-10, 2015-16, 2023-24
“Prices moved in different directions during the selected El Niño windows. These observations do not measure El Niño’s effect: KC=F tracks arabica rather than Vietnam’s robusta, and ZR=F tracks US rough rice rather than Asian rice export prices.”
Price moves were observed around the event — not proof the event caused the entire move.
Read the full recordCurated by Morrowfly — these are things to check, not monitor conditions.
Your call, in your words — recorded privately on this device, with a check-back in 30, 60, or 90 days.
Spotted something wrong, confusing, or missing? It goes straight into our improvement queue.
Something off? Tell us.
Read by a human · never auto-published